Worksheet Usage, Reading Achievement, Classes' Lack of Readiness, and Science Achievement: A Cross-Country Comparison

Che-Di Lee
2.762 769

Abstract


Instructional written materials play important roles as teachersâ agents in effective teaching practices. Worksheets are one of the most frequently used materials. In this exploratory study, the relationships between worksheet usage and science achievement in 32 countries were examined through the use of TIMSS and PIRLS data and multiple regression analysis. Based on two dimensions, five types of relationships among science achievement, worksheet usage, and other related variables are identified. The first dimension is whether the status of significance in the association of worksheets used as a basis and science achievement changes before and after controlling four teacher and school variables: schoolsâ emphases on academic success, safety and orderliness of school, teachersâ confidence in teaching science, and instructional engagement of students. The second dimension is the interaction of worksheets as a basis and classesâ lack of readiness. The interaction between worksheets as a basis and reading achievement in science achievement is found to be not significantly different from zero in all participating countries. Four directions of further investigation are suggested based on the results.

Keywords


Science education, Worksheets, Elementary education, Secondary analysis

Full Text:

PDF (Türkçe)


DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18404/ijemst.38331

References


Anderson, R. C., Hiebert, E. H., Scott, J. A., & Wilkinson, I. A. G. (1985). Becoming a nation of readers: The report of the Commission on Reading. Washington, DC: National Academy of Education, National Institute of Education, Center for the Study of Reading.

Calderhead, W. J., Filter, K. J., & Albin, R. W. (2006). An investigation of incremental effects of interspersing math items on task-related behavior. Journal of Behavioral Education, 15(1), 51–65.

Campbell, C. P. (1999). Instructional materials: Their preparation and evaluation. Journal of European Industrial Training, 23(2), 55–107.

Department of Education and Science (2007). Inclusion of students with special educational needs: Post primary guidelines. Dublin: Stationery Office.

Foy, P. (2013). TIMSS and PIRLS 2011 user guide for the fourth grade combined international database. Chestnut Hill, MA: TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center, Lynch School of Education, Boston College and IEA.

Hayes, D. P., Wolfer, L. T., & Wolfe, M. F. (1996). Schoolbook simplification and its relation to the decline in SAT-Verbal scores. American Educational Research Journal, 33(2), 489–508.

Hoener, A., Salend, S., & Kay, S. I. (1997). Creating readable handouts, worksheets, overheads, tests, review materials, study guides, and homework assignments through effective typographic design. Teaching Exceptional Children, 29(3), 32–35.

Hoffman, D. A., & Gavin, M. B. (1998). Centering decisions in hierarchical linear models: Implications for research in organizations. Journal of Management, 23, 723–744.

IEA Data Processing and Research Center (2013). IDA analyzer. Amsterdam, Netherlands: IEA. Retrieved from http://www.iea.nl/eula.html.

Kisiel, J. F. (2003). Teachers, museums and worksheets: A closer look at a learning experience. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 14(1), 3–21.

Krombab, A., & Harms, U. (2008). Acquiring knowledge about biodiversity in a museum - Are worksheets effective? Journal of Biological Education, 42(4), 157–163.

Lesley, M., & Labbo, L. D. (2003). A pedagogy of control: Worksheets and the special need child. Language Arts, 80(6), 444.

Martin, M. O., & Mullis, I. V. S. (Eds.) (2013). TIMSS and PIRLS 2011: Relationships among reading, mathematics, and science achievement at the fourth grade - Implications for early learning. Chestnut Hill, MA: TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center, Lynch School of Education, Boston College and IEA. Martin, M. O., Mullis, I. V. S., Foy, P., & Stanco, G. M. (2012). TIMSS 2011 international results in science. Chestnut Hill, M.A.: TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center.

McDowell, E. T., & Waddling, R. E. L. (1985). Improving the design of laboratory worksheets. Journal of

Chemical Education, 62(11), 1037–1038.

Meyer, B. J. F. (2003). Text coherence and readability. Topics in Language Disorders, 23(3), 204-224.

O'Leary, S. (2011). The inclusive classroom: Effect of a readability intervention on student engagement and ontask behaviour within two mixed-ability science classrooms. Science Education International, 22(2), 145– 1

Reid, D. (1984). Readability and science worksheets in secondary schools. Research in Science and Technological Education, 2(2), 153–165.

Rix, J. (2006). Simplified language materials: Their usage and value to teachers and support staff in mainstream settings. Teaching and Teacher Education, 22(8), 1145–1156.

Rotter, K. (2006). Creating instructional materials for all pupils: Try COLA. Intervention in School and Clinic, 41(5), 273–282.

Sasmaz-Oren, F., & Ormanci, U. (2012). An application about pre-service teachers' development and use of worksheets and an evaluation of their opinions about the application. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, 12(1), 263–270.

Ueckert, C. W., & Gess-Newsome, J. (2008). Active learning strategies. Science Teacher, 75(9), 47–52.

Wolf, J., Stanton, M., & Gellott, L. (2010). Critical thinking in physical geography: Linking concepts of content and applicability. Journal of Geography, 109(2), 43–53.




Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.