Connectivity Theory at Work: The Referrals between Science and Mathematics in a Science Unit

Deniz Mehmetlioglu, Yasemin Ozdem
2.855 689

Abstract


Researches carried out all around the world showed that students learn more effectively if they are able to make connections between subjects. This case reports based on an investigation of how mathematics concepts were connected to science concepts by a science teacher in an elementary science classroom, and on the science teacherâs views about connectivity. The progress of the instruction of a unit on the structure and properties of matter was observed in a class of forty eight students in a public school in Ankara. The science teacher was interviewed and her views were compared to her practice. The researchers undertook eight hours of observation, and data was collected through field notes and video-recordings. The findings showed that the teacher made connections between the topic and the mathematical components, such as the symbolic representations, arithmetic, counting, equations, the least common multiplier, and the distributive property of multiplication over addition. Although she thought that physics is more available for more connection when it compared to mathematics, we observed that many connections are possible in other areas of science as well.

Keywords


Connectivity theory, Elementary education, Science and mathematics

Full Text:

PDF (Türkçe)


DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18404/ijemst.66637

References


Azzarito, L., & Ennis, C. D. (2003). A Sense of connection: Toward social constructivist physical education. Sport, Education and Society, 8(2), 179-197.

Barab, S. A. (1999). Ecologizing instruction through integrated units. Middle School Journal, 30, 21-28.

Basista, B. & Mathews, S. (2002). Integrated science and mathematics professional development programs. School Science and Mathematics, 102(7), 359-370.

Baskan, Z., Alev, N., & Karal, I. S. (2010). Physics and mathematics teachers’ ideas about topics that could be related or integrated. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2, 1558-1562.

Berlin, D. F. and Lee, H. (2005). Integrating science and mathematics education: Historical analysis. School Science and Mathematics, 105, 15–24.

Berlin, D. F. & White, A.L. (2010). Preservice mathematics and science teachers in an integrated teacher preparation program for grades 7–12: A 3-year study of attitudes and perceptions related to integration. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 8, 97-115.

Ceken R. & Ayas, A. (2010). İlköğretim fen ve teknoloji ile sosyal bilgiler ders programlarında oran ve orantı. Gaziantep Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 9(3), 669-679.

Cobb, P. (2000). The importance of a situated view of learning to the design of research and instruction. In J. Boaler (Ed.), Multiple perspectives on mathematics teaching and learning. Westport, CT: Greenwood Publishing Group, Inc.

Davison, D.M., Miller, K.W., & Metheny, D.L. (1995). What does integration of science and mathematics really mean?. School Science and Mathematics, 95(5), 226-230.

Furner, J. M., & Kumar, D. D. (2007). The mathematics and science integration argument: A stand for teacher education. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 3(3), 185-189.

Friend, H. (1985). The effect of science and mathematics integration on selected seventh grade students’ attitudes toward and achievement in science. School Science and Mathematics, 85(6), 453-461.

Froyd, J. E., & Ohland, M. W. (2005). Integrated engineering curricula. Journal of Engineering Education, 94(1), 147-164.

Frykholm, J., & Glasson, G. (2005). Connecting science and mathematics instruction: Pedagogical context knowledge for teachers. School Science and Mathematics, 105(3), 127-141.




Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.