Investigating the Effect of Different Verbal Formats of Advance Organizers on Third Graders' Understanding of Heat Transfer Concept

Hsueh-Hua Chuang, Han-Chin Liu
4.450 627

Abstract


The emergence of computer and multimedia technology change the forms of instructional materials and instructional design plays an important role on student learning outcome in multimedia learning. Research has found that using advance organizers has the potential for achieving learning objectives. Thus, this study investigated how using different forms (oral narration/onscreen text) of advance organizers (AOs) with different formats (oral narration/onscreen text) of learning content affected third gradersâ learning on heat transfer concepts. A 2X2 design was employed and 126 third grade students participated in this study. It was found in the form of advance organizers that there was a significant interaction with the format of learning content on student post test performance. The form of AOs did not affect student performance when reading onscreen text content. Also, the format of the learning content did not influence student learning when using oral forms of AO. When using onscreen text as AO, it was found that students who read onscreen text content perform better than those who listen to oral narration content. Meanwhile, students who listened to the oral narration AO perform better than those who read the onscreen text AO before listening to the same oral narration learning content. It showed that processing message encoded in the same format in advance help learners later in processing information that was encoded in the same format. Detailed discussions on the findings are provided in this article.

Keywords


Advance organizer, multimedia learning, science education, web-based learning

Full Text:

PDF (Türkçe)


DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18404/ijemst.59887

References


Arguel, A., & Jamet, E. (2009). Using video and static pictures to improve learning of procedural contents. Computers in Human Behavior, 25(2), 354-359.

Atkinson, R. K., Mayer, R. E., & Merrill, M. M. (2005). Fostering social agency in multimedia learning: Examining the impact of an animated agent's voice. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 30(1), 117-1

Ausubel, D. P. (1960). The use of advance organizers in the learning and retention of meaningful verbal material. Journal of Educational Psychology, 51(5), 267–272.

Ausubel, D. P. (1968). Educational psychology: A cognitive view. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.

Ausubel, D. P. (2000). The acquisition and retention of knowledge: A cognitive view. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Ausubel, D. P., & Fitzgerald, D. (1961). The role of discriminability in meaningful parallel learning and retention. Journal of Educational Psychology, 52, 266-274.

Ausubel, D. P., & Fitzgerald, D. (1962). Organizer, general background, and antecedent learning variables in sequential verbal learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 53, 243-249.

Ausubel, D. P., & Robinson, F. G. (1969). School learning: An introduction to educational psychology. New York-Holt, Rinehart & Winston.

Ausubel, D. P., & Youssef, M. (1963). The role of discriminability in meaningful parallel learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 54, 331-336.

Baddeley, A. (2003). Working memory: Looking back and looking forward. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 4(10), 829-839.

Barbosa, H., Marques, M., & Torres, B. (2005). An Advance Organizer for Teaching Bacterial Metabolism. Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education, 33(4), 265-268.

Box, J. (2003). Cooperative Small-Group Instruction Combined with Advanced Organizers and Their Relationship to Self-Concept and Social Studies Achievement of Elementary School Students. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 30(4), 285-287.

Chen, B., Hirumi, A., & Zhang, N. (2007). Investigating the Use of Advance Organizers as an Instructional Strategy for Web-Based Distance Education. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 8(3), 223-231.

Clark, R. E. (1994). Media Will Never Influence Learning. Etr & D- Educational Technology Research and Development, 42(2), 21-29.

De Westelinck, K., Valcke, M., De Craene, B., & Kirschner, P. (2005). Multimedia learning in social sciences: limitations of external graphical representations. Computers in Human Behavior, 21(4), 555-573.

Dembo, M. H. (1991). Applying educational psychology in the classroom. (4 th edition). New York: Longman.

Driscoll, M. P. (1999). Meaningful learning and schema theory. In M. P. Driscoll (Ed.), Psychology of learning for instruction (2nd ed., pp. 113-151). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon. Fitzgerald, D., & Ausubel, D. P. (1963). Cognitive versus affective factors in the learning and retention of controversial material. Journal of Educational Psychology, 54, 73-84.

Gil-Garcia, A., & Villegas, J. (2003, June). Engaging minds, enhancing comprehension and constructing knowledge through visual representations. Paper presented at the Conference on Word Association for Case Method Research and Application, Bordeaux, France.

Herron, C., York, H., Cole, S., & Linden, P. (1998). A Comparison Study of Student Retention of Foreign Language Video: Declarative Versus Interrogative Advance Organizer. Modern Language Journal, 82(2), 237-47.

Lagerwerf, L., Cornelis, L., de Geus, J., & Jansen, P. (2008). Advance Organizers in Advisory Reports: Selective Reading, Recall, and Perception. Written Communication, 25(1), 53-75.

Lin, H., & Chen, T. (2006). Decreasing Cognitive Load for Novice EFL Learners: Effects of Question and Descriptive Advance Organizers in Facilitating EFL Learners' Comprehension of an Animation-Based Content Lesson. System: An International Journal of Educational Technology and Applied Linguistics, 34(3), 416-431.

Luiten, J., Ames, W., & Ackerson, G. (1980). A meta-analysis of the effects of advance organizers on learning and retention. Review of Educational Research, 17(2), 11-218.

Mayer, R. E. (1979). Twenty years of research on advance organizers: Assimilation theory is still the best predictor of results. Instructional Science, 8(2), 133-167.

Mayer, R. E. (2001). Multimedia learning. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Miller, G. A. (1956). The Magical Number 7, Plus or Minus 2 - Some Limits on Our Capacity for Processing Information. Psychological Review, 63(2), 81-97.

Millet, C. P. (2000). The effects of graphic organizers on reading comprehension achievement of second grade students (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of New Orleans, New Orleans.

Paivio, A. (1986). Mental representation: A dual coding approach. New York: Oxford University Press.

She, H.-C., & Chen, Y.-Z. (2009). The impact of multimedia effect on science learning: Evidence from eye movements. Computers & Education, 53(4), 1297-1307.

Stone, C. L. (1983). A meta-analysis of advanced organizer studies. Journal of Experimental Education, 51(4), 194-1

Sweller, J. (1994). Cognitive load theory, learning difficulty, and instructional design. Learning and Instruction, 4(4), 295-312.




Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.