Assessing Teaching and Assessment Competences of Biology Teacher Trainees: Lessons from Item Development

Sascha Hasse, Cora Joachim, Susanne Bögeholz, Marcus Hammann
3.650 855

Abstract


In Germany, science education standards for students at the end of grade nine have been in existance since 2005. Some of these standards are dedicated to scientific inquiry (e.g. experimentation). They describe which abilities learners are expected to possess at the end of grade nine. In the USA, several documents describe standards for Teaching Inquiry (NGSS 2013, NRC 1996/2000/2007, AAAS 1989). Presently, comparable teaching standards for science teachers are mostly lacking in Germany. Further, there are hardly any instruments that allow for the assessment of specific competences pertaining to teaching experimental lessons and assessing student competences in experimentation. Therefore, the aim of the project described in this paper is to develop assessment instruments for biology teachers who are being trained at universities as well as in in-service teacher training programs with respect to i) analyzing experimental biology lessons, ii) planning experimental biology lessons, and iii) assessing student achievements in experimental biology lessons. The article gives insights into ongoing research with respect to assessing the quality of biology teacher education. Finally, the developed measurement instruments should allow for assessing the learning preconditions of future biology teachers. The instruments offer first starting points for the development of sensitive measures for longitudinal studies to investigate university teacher education and teacher traineeship in the subject of biology.


Keywords


Science education, Biology teacher trainees, Measurement instrument, Pedagogical content knowledge, Experimentation.

Full Text:

PDF


DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18404/ijemst.58240

References


AAAS. (1993). Benchmarks for science literacy. Washington D.C.: American Association for the Advancement of Science.

Abell, S. K. (2007). Research on science teacher knowledge. In S. K. Abell, & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Research on science teacher education (pp. 1105-1149). New York: Routledge.

Anderson, R. D. (2002). Reforming science teaching: What research says about inquiry. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 13(1), 1-12.

Baer, M., Kocher, M., Wyss, C., Guldimann, T., Larcher, S., & Dörr, G. (2011). Lehrerbildung und Praxiserfahrung im ersten Berufsjahr und ihre Wirkung auf die Unterrichtskompetenzen von Studierenden und jungen Lehrpersonen im Berufseinstieg. Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissenschaft, 14(1), 85-117.

Blömeke, S. & Zlatkin-Troitschanskaia, O. (Eds.) (2013). The German funding initiative “Modeling and Measuring Competencies in Higher Education”: 23 research projects on engineering, economics and social sciences, education and generic skills of higher education students. (KoKoHs Working Papers, 3). Berlin & Mainz: Humboldt University & Johannes Gutenberg University.

Bund-Länder-Kommission für Bildungsplanung und Forschungsförderung. (1997). Gutachten zur Vorbereitung des Programms "Steigerung der Effizienz des mathematisch-naturwissenschaftlichen Unterrichts". Bonn.

Bühner, M. (2011). Einführung in die Test- und Fragebogenkonstruktion (3., aktualisierte Auflage). München: Pearson Studium.

Bybee, R. W., Taylor, J. A., Gardner, A., van Scotter, P., Carlson Powell, J., Westbrook, A., & Landes, N. (2006). The BSCS 5E instructional model: Origins and effectiveness. Unpublished manuscript.

Bybee, R. W., & Fuchs, B. (2006). Preparing the 21st century workforce: A new reform in science and technology education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43(4), 349-352.

Carey, S., Evans, R., Honda, M., Jay, E., & Unger, C. (1989). "An experiment is when you try it and see if it works": A study of grade 7 students´ understanding of the construction of scientific knowledge. International Journal of Science Education, 11(special issue), 514-529.

Chen, Z., & Klahr, D. (1999). All other things being equal: Acquisition and transfer of the control of variables strategy. Child Development, 70(5), 1098-1120.

Chinn, C. A., & Malhotra, B. A. (2002). Epistemologically authentic inquiry in schools: A theoretical framework for evaluating inquiry tasks. Science Education, 86(2), 175-218.

Coble, C. R., & Allen, M. (2005). Keeping America competitive: Five strategies to improve mathematics and science education. Denver: Education Commission of the States.

Cobern, W. W., Schuster, D. G., Adams, B., Skjold, B., Mugaloglu, E. Z., Bentz, A., & Sparks, K. (2014). Pedagogy of Science Teaching Tests: Formative Assessments of Science Teaching Orientations. International Journal of Science Education. http://bit.ly/RE95xZ

Colburn, A. (1997). How to make lab activities more open ended. CSTA Journal, (Fall 1997), 4-6.

Commons, M. L. (2008). Introduction to the model of hierarchical complexity and its relationship to postformal action. World Futures, 64(5-7), 305-320.

Council of Ministers of Education. (1996). Common framework of science learning outcomes K-12 (draft). Victoria B.C.: Ministry of Education, Skills and Training. de Jong, T., & Ferguson-Hessler, M. (1996). Types and qualities of knowledge. Educational Psychologist, 31(2), 105-113.

Department of Education. (1995). Science in the national curriculum. London.

Driver, R., Leach, J., Millar, R., & Scott, P. (1996). Young people's images of science. Buckingham u.a.: Open Univ. Press.

Dübbelde, G. (2013). Diagnostische Kompetenzen angehender Biologie-Lehrkräfte im Bereich der naturwissenschaftlichen Erkenntnisgewinnung. http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:hebis:342013122044701.

Ericsson, K. A., & Simon, H. A. (1999). Protocol analysis: Verbal reports as data (Rev, 3 print ed.). Cambridge, Mass. u.a.: MIT Press.

Ericsson, K. A., & Simon, H. A. (1980). Verbal reports as data. Psychological Review, 87(3), 215-251.

European Commission (2011). In Eurydice (Ed.), Naturwissenschaftlicher Unterricht in Europa. Brüssel: Exekutivagentur Bildung, Audiovisuelles und Kultur.

Ford, M. (2008). Disciplinary authority and accountability in scientific practice and learning. Science Education, 93(3), 404-423.

Gesellschaft für Fachdidaktik e.V. (2005). Fachdidaktische Kompetenzbereiche, Kompetenzen und Standards für die 1. Phase der Lehrerbildung (BA+MA)

Goodwin, C. (1994). Professional vision. American Anthropologist, 96(3), 606-633.

Gott, R., & Duggan, S. (1995). Investigative work in the science curriculum. Open University Press Buckingham.

Grigg, W., Donahue, P., & Dion, G. (2007). In US Department of Education (Ed.), The nation's report card: 12th-grade reading and mathematics, 2005. NCES 2007-468. Washington D.C.: ERIC.

Gruijter, Dato N. M. de, & Kamp, L. J. T. v. d. (2008). Statistical test theory for the behavioral sciences. Boca Raton u.a.]: Chapman & Hall/CRC, Boca Raton u.a.].

Gyllenpalm, J., Wickman, P., & Holmgren, S. (2010). Teachers´ language on scientific inquiry: Methods of teaching or methods of inquiry. International Journal of Science Education, 32(9), 1151-1172.

Hammann, M., Phan, T. T. H., Ehmer, M., & Grimm, T. (2008). Assessing pupils' skills in experimentation. Journal of Biological Education, 42(2), 66-72.

Hammann, M., Ganser, M., & Haupt, M. (2007). Experimentieren können. kompetenzentwicklungsmodelle und ihre nutzung im unterricht. Geographie Heute, (255/256), 88-91.

Hammann, M., Phan, T. T. H., Ehmer, M., & Bayrhuber, H. (2006). Fehlerfrei experimentieren. Mathematischer und Naturwissenschaftlicher Unterricht, 59(5), 292-299.

Hofstein, A., & Lunetta, V. N. (2004). The laboratory in science education: Foundations for the twenty-first century. Science Education, 88(1), 28-54.

Hussy, W., Schreier, M., & Echterhoff, G. (2010). Forschungsmethoden in Psychologie und Sozialwissenschaften für Bachelor. Berlin: Springer.

Kanari, Z., & Millar, R. (2004). Reasoning from data: How students collect and interpret data in science investigations. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(7), 748-769.

Kiper, H. (2012). Unterricht planen, durchführen, auswerten - Überlegungen zur lernwirksamen Unterrichts planung. In K. Bauer, & N. Logemann (Eds.), (pp. 151-182). Münster: Waxmann Verlag.

Klahr, D. (2000). Exploring science: The cognition and development of discovery processes. Cambridge: MIT Press.

Klieme, E., & Leutner, D. (2006). Kompetenzmodelle zur erfassung individueller lernergebnisse und zur bilanzierung von bildungsprozessen. beschreibung eines neu eingrichteten schwerpunktprogramms der DFG [competence models for assessing individual learning outcomes and evaluating educational processes. description of a new priority program of the German research foundation, DFG]. Zeitschrift Für Pädagogik, 52(6), 876-903.

Kline, T. (2005). Psychological testing. Thousand Oaks: SAGE.

KMK. (2004). Bildungsstandards im Fach Biologie für den mittleren Schulabschluss. Beschluss vom 2004 Luchterhand.

Koeppen, K., Hartig, J., Klieme, E., & Leutner, D. (2008). Current issues in competence modeling and assessment. Zeitschrift Für Psychologie/Journal of Psychology, 216(2), 61-73.

Magnusson, S., Krajcik, J., & Borko, H. (1999). Nature, sources and development of pedagogical content knowledge for science teaching. In J. Gess-Newsome, & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Examining pedagogical content knowledge (pp. 95-132). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Ministry of Education. (1993). Science in the New Zealand curriculum. Wellington, New Zealand: New Media. Mulhall, P., Berry, A., & Loughran, J. (2003). Framework for representing science teachers´ pedagogical content knowledge. Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, 4(2)

Murphy, K. R., & Davidshofer, C. O. (2005). Psychological testing: Principles and applications (6, international ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education International, Prentice-Hall.

National Research Council. (2000). Inquiry and the national science education standards. A guide for teaching and learning. Washington D.C.: National Academy Press.

National Research Council. (2007). In Duschl R. A., Schweingruber H. A. and Shouse A. W.(Eds.), Taking science to school: Learning and teaching science in grades K-8. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.

National Research Council. (1996). National science education standards. Washington D.C.: National Academy Press.

NGSS Lead States. (2013). Next generation science standards: For states, by states. Washington D.C.: The National Academy Press.

Oser, F., Heinzer, S., & Salzmann, P. (2010). Die Messung der Qualität von professionellen Kompetenzprofilen von Lehrpersonen mit Hilfe der Einschätzung von Filmvignetten. Chancen und Grenzen des advokatorischen Ansatzes. Unterrichtswissenschaft, 38(1), 5-28.

PISA-Konsortium Deutschland. (2004). PISA 2003: Der Bildungsstand der Jugendlichen in Deutschland– Ergebnisse des zweiten internationalen Vergleichs.

Plöger, W., & Scholl, D. (2014). Analysekompetenz von Lehrpersonen – Modellierung und Messung. Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissenschaft, 17(1), 85-112.

Psillos, D., & Niedderer, H. (2002). Teaching and learning in the science laboratory. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Sandoval, W. A., & Reiser, B. J. (2004). Explanation-driven inquiry: Integrating conceptual and epistemic scaffolds for scientific inquiry. Science Education, 88(3), 345-372.

Sherin, M. G. (2002). When teaching becomes learning. Cognition and Instruction, 20(2), 119-150.

Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growths in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1-22.

Seidel, T, Stürmer, K, Blomberg, G, Kobarg, M, Schwindt, K. (2011). “Teacher learning from analysis of videotaped classroom situations: does it make a difference whether teachers observe their own teaching or that or others?” Teaching and Teacher Education, 27: 259-267.

Weinert, F. E. (2001). Concept of competence: A conceptual clarification. In D. S. Rychen, & L. H. Salganik (Eds.), Defining and selecting key competencies (pp. 45-65). Seattle: Hogrefe & Huber Publishers.

Weinert, F. E. (2000). Lehren und Lernen für die Zukunft – Ansprüche an das Lernen in der Schule. Pädagogische Nachrichten Rheinland-Pfalz 2, 1-16

Weinert, F. E. (1999). Konzepte der Kompetenz. Gutachten zum OECD-Projekt "Definition and Selection of Competencies: Theoretical and conceptual foundations (DeSeCo)".

White, R., & Gunstone, R. (1992). Probing understanding. London: Falmer Press.

Wilson, M. (2005). Constructing measures: An item response modeling approach. London: Routledge.




Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.