Preservice Teachers’ Internet Addiction in Terms of Gender, Internet Access, Loneliness and Life Satisfaction
The aim of this study is to investigate pre-service teachers’ Internet addiction in terms of gender, Internet accessibility, loneliness and life satisfaction. Statistical analyses were completed on the data by the 247 pre-service teachers that filled the surveys completely. According to findings, pre-service teachers’ level of loneliness and Internet addiction scores is low while their life satisfaction scores are high. Male participants are more addicted to the Internet than female participants. Also those, males and females, who had Internet access, had more tendencies to be addicted to the Internet. There is evidence to indicate a positive correlation between loneliness and Internet addiction, and negative correlation between life satisfaction and Internet addiction. Based on the results several different suggestions are made for continuing research in this field.
Akkoyunlu, B. (2002). Öğretmenlerin Internet kullanımı ve bu konudaki öğretmen görüşleri (Use of Internet by teachers and their opinions on the issue). Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 22, 1-8.
Amichai-Hamburger, Y., & Ben-Artzi, E. (2003). Loneliness and Internet use. Computers in Human Behavior, 19(1), 71–80.
Beard, K.W. (2002). Internet addiction: Current status and implications for employees. Journal of Employment Counseling, 39(2), 2-11.
Bin, W. (2006). A study on the relationship between the loneliness and Internet addiction tendency of college students. Psychological Science, 6.
Block, J. J. (2008). Issues for DSM-V: Internet Addiction. The American Journal of Psychiatry, 165(3), 306-307.
Booth, R. (2000). Loneliness as a component of psychiatric disorders. Medscape Mental Health, 5(2).
Brenner, V. (1997). Psychology of computer use: XLVII. Parameters of Internet use, abuse and addiction: The first 90 days of the Internet usage survey. Psychological Reports, 80, 879–882.
Brosnan, M. (1998). Technophobia: The psychological impact of information technology. London: Routledge.
Chou, C. & Hsiao, M. (2000). Internet addiction, usage, gratification, and pleasure experience: Taiwan college students’ case. Computer & Education, 35(1), 65-80.
Comber, C., Colley, A., Hargreaves, D. J., & Dorn, L. (1997). The effects of age, gender and computer experience upon computer attitudes. Educational Research, 39(2), 123-133.
Contarello, A., & Sarrica, M. (2007). ICTs, social thinking and subjective well-being – The Internet and its representations in everyday life. Computers in Human Behavior, 23(2), 1016-1032.
Dell'Osso, B., Altamura, A.C., Allen, A., Marazziti, D., Hollander, E. (2006). Epidemiologic and clinical updates on impulse control disorder: a critical review. European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience, 256, 464–475.
Demir, A. (1989). UCLA yalnızlık ölçeğinin geçerlik ve güvenirliği. [Validity and reliability of UCLA loneliness scale]. Psikoloji dergisi, 23(7), 14–18.
Diener, E., Emmons, R.A., Larsen, R.J., & Griffin, S. (1985). The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of Personality Assessment. 49(1), 71-75.
Donchi, L., & Moore, S. (2004). It’s a boy thing: The role of the Internet in young people’s psychological wellbeing. Behavior Change, 21(2), 76-89.
Ekinci, A. (2002). Aziz Antonius’un baştan çıkarılması: Bir kötü alışkanlık olarak Internet (Enticing Saint Antonius: Internet as an abusing addiction). Cogito Dergisi, 30, 227-235.
Erdoğan, Y. (2008). Exploring the relationship among Internet usage, Internet attitudes and loneliness of Turkish adolescents. Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace, 2(2), 1-7.
Griffiths, M. (1999). Internet addiction: Fact or Fiction? The Psychologist, 12(5), 246-250.
Hall, A. S., & Parsons, J. (2001). Internet addiction: College student case study using best practices in cognitive behavior therapy. Journal of Mental Health Counseling, 23 (4), 312-327.
Hu, M. (2007). Social use of Internet and loneliness. Doctoral Dissertation. Ohio State University, Graduate School. Retrieved from 23 January, 2012, http://etd.ohiolink.edu/send-pdf.cgi/Hu%20Mu.pdf?osu1186168233
Iacovelli, A., & Valenti, S. (2009). Internet addiction’s effect one likeability and rapport. Computers in Human Behavior, 25(2), 439-443.
Jang, S. K., Hwang, S. Y., & Choi, J. Y. (2008). Internet addiction and psychiatric sypmtoms among Korean adolescents. Journal of School Health, 78(3), 165-172.
Johansson, A., & Götestam, K. G. (2004). Internet addiction: Characteristics of a questionnaire and prevalence in Norwegian youth (12–18 years). Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 45(3), 223–229.
Kesici, S., & Sahin, I. (2010). Turkish adaptation study of Internet addiction scale. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 13(2), 185-189.
Kirkup, G. (1995). Gender issues and learning technologies. British Journal of Educational Technology, 26(3), 218-219.
Ko, C. H., Yen, J. Y., Chen, C. C., Chen, S. H., & Yen, C.F. (2005). Gender differences and related factors affecting online gaming addiction among Taiwanese adolescents. Journal of Nervous & Mental Disease. 193(4), 273-277.
Köker, S. (1991). Normal ve sorunlu ergenlerin yaşam doyumu düzeylerinin karşılaştırılması. (Unpublished Master Dissertation). Ankara: Ankara Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü.
Kraut, R., Patterson, M., Lundmark, V., Kiesler, S., Mukopadhyay, T., & Scherlis, W. (1998). Internet paradox: A social technology that reduces social involvement and psychological well-being? American Psychologist, 53, 1017-1031.
Lavin, M., Marvin, K., McLarney, A., Nola, V., & Scott, L. (1999). Sensation seeking and collegiate vulnerability to Internet dependence. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 2, 425-430.
Leung, L. (2004). Net-generation attributes and seductive properties of the Internet as predictors of online activities and Internet addiction. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 7(3), 333-348.
Li, N., & Kirkup, G. (2007). Gender and cultural differences in Internet use: A study of China and UK. Computers & Education, 48(2), 301-317.
Morahan-Martin, J. (1999). The relationship between loneliness and Internet use and abuse. Cyber Psychology & Behavior, 2(5), 431-439.
Morahan-Martin, J., & Schumacher, P. (2003). Loneliness and social uses of the Internet. Computers and Human Behavior, 19(6), 659-671.
Moody, E. J. (2001). Internet use and its relationship to loneliness. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 4(3), 393-401.
Nie, N. H., & Erbring, L. (2000). Internet and society: A preliminary report. Stanford Institute for the Quantitative Study of Society. Retrieved January 24, 2012, http://www2.uca.es/HEURESIS/documentos/Preliminary_Report.pdf
Oldfield, B., & Howitt, D. (2004). Loneliness, social support and Internet use. Paper presented at the conference of Internet Research 5.0: Ubiquity?, Sussex, UK.
O’Toole, K. (2000). Study offers early look at how Internet is changing daily life. Stanford News. Retrieved January 25, 2012, www.stanford.edu/dept/news/pr/00/000216Internet.html
Prezza, M., Pacilli, M. G., & Dinelli, S. (2004). Loneliness and new technologies in a group of Roman adolescents. Computers in Human Behavior, 20(5), 691-709.
Russell, D., Peplau, L. A., & Cutrona, C.E . (1980). The revised UCLA loneliness scale: Concurrent and discriminant validity evidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39(3), 472–480.
Sahin, I., Erdogan, A., & Akturk, A.O. (2007). Öğretmen adaylarının uygulamarından doyumlarını yordayıcı faktörler (Factors that predict pre-service teachers’ life satisfaction in term of their practices). Selçuk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 17.
Sanders, C., Field, T., Diego, M., & Kaplan, M. (2000). The relationship of Internet use to depression and social isolation among adolescents. Adolescence, 35, 237–242.
Scherer, K. (1997). College life on-line: Healthy and unhealthy Internet use. Journal of College Student Development, 38(6), 655–665.
Scragg, G., & Smith, J. (1998). A study of barriers to women in undergraduate Computer Science. Proceedings of the 29th SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (pp.82-86). Atlanta, GA.
Shaw, L.H., & Gant, L.M. (2002a). In defense of the Internet: The relationship communication and depression, loneliness, self-esteem and perceived social support. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 5(2), 157-171.
Shaw, L. H., & Gant, L. M. (2002b). Users divided? Exploring the gender gap in Internet use. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 5(6), 517-527.
Stoll, C. (1995). Silicon Snake Oil. New York: Anchor Books.
Turkle, S. (1996). Virtuality and its discontents: Searching for community in cyberspace. The American Prospect, 24, 50-57.
Usta, E., Bozdoğan, A. E., & Yıldırım, K. (2007). Sınıf öğretmeni adaylarının Internet kullanımına ilişkin tutumlarının değerlendirilmesi (Evaluating elementary pre-service teachers’ attitudes toward Internet use). Ahi Evran Üniversitesi Kırşehir Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 8(1), 209-222.
Vas, L, & Gombor, A. (2009). Exploring Internet motives and life satisfaction among Hungarian and Israeli medical students, living in Hungary. Journal of Happiness Studies, 10(6), 685-701.
Weiser, E. B. (2001). The functions of Internet use and their social and psychological consequences. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 4, 723-743.
Whitty, M.T., & McLaughlin, D. (2007). Online recreation: The relationship between loneliness, Internet self-efficacy and the use of the Internet for entertainment purposes. Computers in Human Behavior, 23(3), 1435–1446.
Widyanto, L., & McMurran, M. (2004). The psychometric properties of the Internet addiction test. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 7, 443-450.
Yang, C. K. (2001). Sociopsychiatric characteristics of adolescents who use computers to excess. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 104(3), 217-222.
Yang, S. C., & Tung, C. J. (2007). Comparison of Internet addicts and non-addicts in Taiwanese high school. Computers in Human Behavior, 23(1), 79-96.
Young, K. S. (1998). Internet addiction: The emergence of a new clinical disorder. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 1(3), 237–244.
Zhang, Y. (2005). Age, gender, and Internet attitudes among employees in the business world. Computers in Human Behavior, 21(1), 1–10.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.