The effects of propofol and a diazepam/alfentanil combination in dogs aged 10 years and above on heart rate, respiratory rate, pulse oximetry data, intraocular pressure, and body temperature

Özlem GÜZEL, Dilek OLĞUN ERDİKMEN, Esma YILDAR, Aslı EKİCİ, Murat ŞAROĞLU, Bülent EKİZ
454 117

Abstract


In older patients, it is important to minimise anaesthesia-related deaths and complications. In this study, 2 separate anaesthesia inductions were evaluated with respect to their effects on heart rate, respiratory rate, pulse oximetry data, intraocular pressure, and body temperature. A total of 22 dogs were evaluated and 2 separate anaesthesia groups were formed. Propofol (6 mg/kg) was administered to group G1 via a slow intravenous (IV) injection. In group G2, diazepam (0.5 mg/kg) was first administered via an IV injection, followed immediately by alfentanil (40 µg/kg), administered via a slow IV route. Each parameter was recorded prior to anaesthesia (T0), immediately after anaesthesia induction (min 0-T1), 5 min after induction (T2), immediately after intubation (min 0-T3), and 5 min after intubation (T4). Statistical analysis was performed by repeated measurements of ANOVA and independent samples t-test methods in SPSS 10.0. While no difference was observed between the times of measurements in group G1 regarding heart rate, respiratory rate, and pulse oximetry data, differences were determined between the measurement times in group G2. In group G1, a drop occurred in intraocular pressure immediately after anaesthesia induction. In group G2, a decrease in intraocular pressure was observed in the measurement taken 5 min after induction. Body temperature dropped significantly in both groups. It was concluded that, in the anaesthesia induction of patients aged 10 years and above, propofol, with more reliable findings, should be preferred over the diazepam/alfentanil combination.

Keywords


Key words: Propofol, diazepam/alfentanil, heart rate, intraocular pressure, dog

Full Text:

PDF

References


Zimmerman, A.A., Funk, K.J., Tidwell, J.L.: Propofol and alfentanil prevent the increase in intraocular pressure caused by succinylcholine and endotracheal intubation during a rapid sequence induction of anesthesia. Vet. Anaesth. Analg., 1996; 83: 814–817.

Batista, C.M., Laus, J.L., Nunes, N., Dos Santos, P.S.P., Costa, J.L.O.: Evaluation of intraocular and partial CO 2 pressure in dogs anesthetized with propofol. Vet. Ophthalmol., 2000; 3: 17–

Perk, E.C., Güzel, Ö., Gülanber, E.G.: Etomidate/alfentanil anaesthesia in dogs and its effects on pulse oxymeter, electrocardiography and haematological parameters. Turk. J. Vet. Anim. Sci., 2002; 26: 1021–1024.

Hofmeister, E.H., Williams, C.O., Braun, C., Moore, P.A.: Influence of lidocaine and diazepam on peri-induction intraocular pressures in dogs anesthetized with propofolatracurium. Can. J. Vet. Res., 2006; 70: 251–256.

Hofmeister, H., Weinstein, W.L., Burger, D., Brainard, M., Accola, P.J., Moore, P.A.: Effects of graded doses of propofol for anesthesia induction on cardiovascular parameters and intraocular pressures in normal dogs. Vet. Anaesth. Analg., 2009; 36: 442–448.

Covey-Crump, G.L., Murison, P.J.: Fentanyl or midazolam for co-induction of anaesthesia with propofol in dogs. Vet. Anaesth. Analg., 2008; 35: 463–472.

Gimenes, A.M., de Araujo Aguiar, A.J., Peri, S.H.V., de Paula Nogueira, G.: Effect of intravenous propofol and remifentanil on heart rate, blood pressure and nociceptive response in acepromazine premedicated dogs. Vet. Anaesth. Analg., 2011; 38: 54–62.

Psatha, E., Alibhai, H.I.K., Jimenez-Lozano, A., ArmitageChan, E., Brodbelt, D.C.: Clinical efficacy and cardiorespiratory effects of alfaxalone, or diazepam/fentanyl for induction of anaesthesia in dogs that are a poor anaesthetic risk. Vet. Anaesth. Analg., 2011; 38: 24–36.

Guzel, O., Perk, E.C., Devecioglu, Y.: Electrocardiographic and oxygen saturation studies during propofol and etomidate anaesthesia in dogs. Indian Vet. J., 2006; 83: 288–289.

Sator-Katzenschlager, S., Deusch, E., Dolezal, S., MichalekSauberer, A., Grubmüller, R., Heinze, G., Wedrich, A.: Sevoflurane and propofol decrease intraocular pressure equally during non-opthalmic surgery and recovery. Br. J. Anaesth., 2002; 89: 764–766.

Tamura, E.Y., Barros, P.S.M., Cortopassi, S.R.G., Ambrósio, A.M., Fantoni, D.T.: Effects of two preanesthetic regimens for ophthalmic surgery on intraocular pressure and cardiovascular measurements in dogs. Vet. Ther., 2002; 3: 81–87.

Hofmeister, E.H., Williams, C.O., Braun, C., Moore, P.A.: Propofol versus thiopental: effects on peri-induction intraocular pressure in normal dogs. Vet. Anaesth. Analg., 2008; 35: 275–281.

Lemke, K.A.: Anticholinergics and sedatives. In: Tranquilli, W.J., Thurmon, J.C., Grimm, K.A., Eds. Lumb & Jones’ Veterinary Anesthesia and Analgesia, 4th ed., Blackwell, Oxford, 2007; 203–239.

Rozanski, E.A., Rush, J.E.: A Color Handbook of Small Animal Emergency and Critical Care Medicine. 1st ed., Manson Publishing Ltd., London. 2007; 221–229.

Lamont, L.A., Mathews, K.A.: Opioids, nonsteroidal antiinflammatories, and analgesic adjuvants. In: Tranquilli, W.J., Thurmon, J.C., Grimm, K.A., Eds. Lumb & Jones’ Veterinary Anesthesia and Analgesia, 4th ed., Blackwell, Oxford, 2007; 241–271.

Bovill, J.G., Sebel, P.S., Stanley, T.H.: Opioid analgesics in anesthesia: with special reference to their use in cardiovascular anesthesia. Anesthesiology, 1984; 61: 731–755.

Wilson, D.V.: Advantages and guidelines for using opioid agonists for induction of anesthesia. Vet. Clin. North Am. Small Anim. Pract., 1992; 22: 269–272.

Auckburally, A., Pawson, P., Flaherty, D.: A comparison of induction of anaesthesia using a target-controlled infusion device in dogs with propofol or a propofol and alfentanil admixture. Vet. Anaesth. Analg., 2008; 35: 319–325.

Topal, A.: Veteriner Anestezi. 1st ed., Nobel & Güneş Tıp Kitabevi, Bursa. 2005; 107–128.

Carroll, G.L., Martin, D.D.: Trauma and critical patients. In: Tranquilli, W.J., Thurmon, J.C., Grimm, K.A., Eds., Lumb & Jones’ Veterinary Anesthesia and Analgesia, 4th ed., Blackwell, Oxford, 2007; 969–984.

Hardie, E.M., Lukasik, V.M.: Orthopedic patients. In: Tranquilli, W.J., Thurmon, J.C., Grimm, K.A., Eds., Lumb & Jones’ Veterinary Anesthesia and Analgesia, 4th ed., Blackwell, Oxford, 2007; 1009–1017.

Mutoh, T.: Effects of premedication with fentanyl and midazolam on mask induction of anaesthesia of dogs with sevoflurane. Vet. Rec., 2007; 160: 152–157.

Pettifer, G.R., Dyson, D.H.: Comparison of medetomidine and fentanyl-droperidol in dogs: Sedation, analgesia, arterial blood gases and lactate levels. Can. J. Vet. Res., 1993; 57: 99–105.