Düzenli Hiyerarşik Karar Verme Birimlerinin Etkinlik Değerlendirmesi Üzerine Bir Monte Carlo Çalışması

H. Hasan ÖRKÇÜ, İhsan ALP
559

Öz


Bu çalışmada her biri birçok alt karar verme birimlerinden (AKVB) oluşan, girdi ve çıktıları toplanabilir üst karar verme birimlerinin (UKVB) etkinlik skorlarını hesaplamada olası iki yolun Monte Carlo yöntemi ile karşılaştırılması yapıldı. Problem 2002 FİFA Dünya Kupası takımlarının etkinlik skorları değerlendirmesi sırasında ortaya çıktı. Oyuncular birer AKS/B ve takımlar UKVB gibi düşünülebilir. Takım etkinlik skoru oyuncu etkinlik skorlarından ya da takım verilerden hareketle hesaplanabilir. İki yolla elde edilen sonuçlar Mann Whitney U testiyle test edildi. UKVB'lerin aynı çaplı AKVB'lerden oluşması durumu, faklı UKVB ve farklı girdi çıktı sayılı denemeler için tekrarlandı. VIA modellerinden CCR ve BCCiçin yapılan denemelerden birbirine paralel sonuçlar elde edildi.

Referanslar


1. BANKER,R.D.,CHARNES,A.,COOPER,W.W.,(1984),Somemodels for esti mating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis, Management Science, 30(9), 1078-1092

2. BANKER, R.D., GADH, V.M., GORR, W.L., (1993), A monte carlo comparison of two production frontier estimation methods: corrected ordinary le ast squares and data envelopment analysis, European Journal of Opera tional Research, 67,332-343

3. BANKER R. D., CHANG H., COOPER W.W., (2004), A simulation study of DEA and parametric frontier models in the presence of heteroscedasti city, European Journal of Operational Research, 153,324-340

4. BARDHAN I.R., COOPER W.W., KUMBHAKAR S.C, (1998), A simulation study of joint uses od Data Envelopment Analysis and Statistical Reg ressions for Production Function Estimation and Efficiency Evaluation, Journal of Productivity Analysis, 9,249-278

5. BIFULCO R., BRETSCHNEIDER S., (2001), Estimating school efficiency: A comparison of methods using simulated data, Economics and Educaton Review, 20,417-429

6. BOJANIC A. N., CAUDILL S. B., FORD J. M., (1998), Small-sample properties of ML, COLS and DEA estimators of frontier models in the presence of heteroscedasticity, European Journal of Operational Research, 108, 140-148

7. CHAPARRO F. P., JIMENEY J.S., (1997), On the role of weight restrictions in DEA, Journal of Productivity Analysis, 8,215-230

8. CHARNES A, COOPER W.W., RHODES E., (1978), The efficiency of decision making units", European Journal of Operational Research, 2,429-444

9. DEBREU G., (1951), The coefficient of resource utilisation, Econometrica,19,273-292

10. DESAI A., RATICK J. S., SCHINNAR A. P., (in pres), Data Envelopment Analysis with stochastic variations in data, Socio Economic Planning Scien ces

11. FARRELL M J., (1957), The measurement of productivity efficiency, Jour nal of Royal Statistical Society, Serie A, CXX, 253-287

12. GONG, B., SICKLESS, R.C., (1992), Finite sample evidence on the perfor mance of stochastic frontiers and data envelopment analysis using pa nel data, Journal of Econometrics, 51,259-284

13. GOTTOUFI S., ORAL M., RE ISM AN A., (2003) "Data Envelopment Analysis literature a bibliyograpy uptade (1951-2001), Socio Economic Planning Sciences, doi: 10.(016/50038-0121

14. GOTTOUFI S., ORAL M., REISMAN A., (2004), A taxonomy for data enve lopment analysis, Socio Economic Planning Sciences, 38,141-158

15. HAAS D. A., MURPHY F.H., (2003), Compesanting for non-homogeneity in decision making units in data envelopment analysis, European Journal of Operational Research, 144,530-544

16. HUGHES A,YAISAWARNG S., (2004), Sensitivity and dimensionalitytests of DEA efficiency scores, European Journal of Operational Research, 154, 410-422

17. MCMULLENP.,FRAZIERG.V.,(1998),Using simulation and Data Evelop ment Analysis to Compare Assembly Line Balancing Solutions, Journals of Productivity Analysis, 11,149-168

18. LOTHGREN M., (1999), Bootsrapping the Malmquist peoductivity index a simulation study", Applied Economic Letters, 6(11), 707-710

19. LOTHGREN M., (2000), On the consistency of DEA-based average effici ency bootsrap", Applied Economic Letters, 7 (1), 53-57

20. RAJIV, D.B., SURYA, J., RAM, N., (2004), Analysis of trends in technical and allocative efficiency: An application to Texas public school districts, European Journal of Operational Research, 154 (2), 477-491

21. SEIFORD L.M., (1997), A bibliyography for data envelopment analysis (1978-1996), Annals of Operations Research, 73,279-281

22. SHAWN A, G., DIMITRI, M., VIVIAN, V, (2004), Competetive effects on teaching hospitals, European Journal of Operational Research, 154 (2), 515- 525

23. SUOYESHIT., (2001), ExtendedDEA-Discriminant Analysis, European Jo urnal of Operational Research, 131,324-351

24. WARRY S.H., (2003), Adaptive non-parametric efficiency frontier analy sis: a neural network-based model, Computers and Operations Rese arch, 30 (2), 279-295

25. www.fifaworldcup.yahoo.com./o2/en/t/st/gk/mp/

Erişim Tarihi: 20.05.2004